Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 18:24
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 741
75% 606 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 84.8
54% 73.8 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 43.4
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 435 429 430 444 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 435
Mixed 421
SusWrite 438
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.6
180% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 54.5
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 70.6
60% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 137%
Jmicron Generic 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 1214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 326 323 325 324 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 321
Write 322
Mixed 255
SusWrite 325
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 25.9
87% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 151
118% 162 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 78%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 97 105 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 166 143 181 149 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 136
Write 100
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 160
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 28.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback