Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 196 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 493 51% 410 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 5 4% 5.3 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 600GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 416 422 424 416 417 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 449 Mixed 418 SusWrite 424 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 37.6 121% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 366 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 24GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.5% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.3 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 17.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	1x
MX500 1TBCrucial $81Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	1x
18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 24GBMicronBench 53%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $449

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16