Gigabyte GA-P64V6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P64V6  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 13:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 179
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 526
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 2464) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 58.5
46% 61 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 61
50% 61 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 52%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 2464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 5.6
5% 26.2 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G890109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 103 152 126 104 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 468
Write 402
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 153
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 44.3
142% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 213
144% 181 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 99U5663-006.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P64V6 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P64V6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback