Lenovo 30E1CTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30E1CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory117.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 19:22
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 12-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,066
96% 811 Pts
64-Core 2,152
133% 2,152 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5500
Legend(17AA 104F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 93.9
52% 74.5 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 42.2
46% 57.6 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,972
Write 3,304
Mixed 2,967
690% 3,081 MB/s
4K Read 78.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 106
352% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 874
655% 880 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 419%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 142 144 143 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 143
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-3G2J3 127GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 26
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30E1CTO1WW Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 30E1CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback