Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0EX004DUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0EX004DUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 371D
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 10:19
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 70.2
35% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 148
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 371D) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.44.07
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.1
3% 5.1 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 9.1
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L1 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 77 74 73 71 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 813
Write 122
Mixed 135
SusWrite 74.1
61% 286 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 20.6
99% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 164
119% 157 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0EX004DUK Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0EX004DUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback