HP p7-1519c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1519c  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 11:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 158
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 305
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.4
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.8
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 203 186 162 217 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 254
Write 222
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 169
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 9.9
73% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 70.4
DQ Mixed 10.4
18% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
748GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 104 107 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 108
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 8502 PSD34G16002 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1519c Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1519c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback