Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191202
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '22 at 18:52
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 244 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 687 74% 586 Pts	64-Core 665 41% 665 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.7% Very good	Lighting 90.8 Reflection 90 Parallax 89 74% 89.9 fps	MRender 92.9 Gravity 84.5 Splatting 73.1 67% 83.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 580GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1862 1945 1698 1625 1661 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 1,700 Write 1,748 Mixed 1,744 SusWrite 1,766 393% 1,739 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 50.1 161% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,384 DQ Write 1,087 DQ Mixed 1,224 919% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 488%
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB 18,375 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 466GB free Firmware: 111110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 990 980 970 984 991 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1761 Write 1,692 Mixed 1,527 SusWrite 1,031 338% 1,503 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 38.7 126% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,554 DQ Write 1135 DQ Mixed 1323 994% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 402GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 137 141 146 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 143 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.4% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 20.6 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 20.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	25x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	24x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	32x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	22x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	16x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $587

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16