Lenovo 30DKS04Y00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30DKS04Y00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1048
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220329
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 23:29
Run Duration554 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-1290
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 714
67% 557 Pts
64-Core 1,359
84% 1,359 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
Nvidia(10DE 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 53
Parallax 46.5
39% 49.2 fps
MRender 53.6
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 47.4
39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2161 2215 2222 2219 2185 2197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 1,664
Write 2,233
Mixed 1,848
SusWrite 2,200
450% 1,986 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 55.1
186% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 677
507% 679 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 289%
Great: 565%
Samsung MZ7LH1T0HALB-000L7 1TB
751GB free
Firmware: RVT02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 479 478 478 477 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 476
Mixed 440
SusWrite 478
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 47.1
152% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 113%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CVF 63GB
2933, 2933 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 22.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30DKS04Y00 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Lenovo 30DKS04Y00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback