HP 20-r104la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 20-r104la (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B3C
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180313
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '22 at 22:50
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160T 2,374 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 120 52% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 170 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2B3C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 4.2 2% 2.87 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 902GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 140 93 59 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 163 Write 156 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 115 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567, data traveler 32 gb Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.8 3.3 3 5.1 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.8% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 8.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 3.5 12% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20-r104la Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 20-r104la

CPU
Core i3-4160TIntelBench 58%, 2,374 samples	5x
Core i3-4160TIntelBench 63%, 26 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	7x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 9,805 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16