Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 03:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 48
2-Core 134
54% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 450
42% 349 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2316) 3GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 50.1
32% 40.7 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 22.2
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 375 377 378 383 383 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 460
Write 382
Mixed 380
SusWrite 377
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 29.8
119% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 48.9
86% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM F3-12800CL7-4GBXM F3-2400C11-8GXM F3-12800CL7-4GBXM 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $612
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback