| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME Q270M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171211 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 02 '22 at 08:52 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.9%
Excellent
|
88% 157 Pts
|
71% 568 Pts
|
41% 663 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
30% 39.5 fps
|
28% 35.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 336 279 297 297 297 MB/s
|
120%
Outstanding
|
89% 397 MB/s
|
209% 74.6 MB/s
|
255% 352 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 207 207 206 208 195 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
122% 167 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
48GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.6 MB/s
|
6.11%
Terrible
|
16% 13.4 MB/s
|
39% 2.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
77%
Very good
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
70% 24.5 GB/s
|
64% 62.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 226 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 66x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 26x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 28x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $167 |