Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5630 579 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 61.6 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 122 48% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 413 40% 327 Pts	64-Core 616 38% 616 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% XFX(1682 9390) CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 79.4 48% 70.1 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 44 43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW210602 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 147 143 143 123 140 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.6% Average	Read 216 Write 193 Mixed 186 SusWrite 143 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 13.2 79% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 15.6 21% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C-H9 4x16GB 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.4% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.9 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon L55201stBench 57%, 246 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56301stBench 61%, 579 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P6000NvidiaBench 120%, 805 samples	2x
R9 390AMD $325Bench 50%, 82,117 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
SL500 240GBColorfulBench 69%, 1,190 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 17 samples	1x
HMT42GR7MFR4C-H9 4x16GBHynixBench 32%, 1 sample	1x
9965447-018.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94