Today's hottest deals

Cincoze GP-3000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCincoze GP-3000  (all builds)
MotherboardCINCOZE GP-3000
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 07:35
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 292
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 860
88% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 258
Parallax 9
5% 91 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 12.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 129 121 123 121 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 348
Write 185
Mixed 208
SusWrite 122
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 22
84% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 172
149% 219 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-BGM2O5UN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 26.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 28.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GP-3000 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: Cincoze GP-3000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback