HP HPE-350es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-350es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 15:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 106
50% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 163
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.6% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 30.3
25% 33.5 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 21.8
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$189
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 220 201 191 220 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 214
Write 177
Mixed 196
SusWrite 213
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 25.4
87% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 177
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
224GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 113 114 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX1866C10D3/8G CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 9801 99U5403-048.A00LF CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-350es Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP HPE-350es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback