Lenovo 20N20044US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20N20044US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N20044US
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8665U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 248
74% 139 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 518
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2279) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 1
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 383 383 358 377 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 361
Write 349
Mixed 327
SusWrite 381
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 44.7
132% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 341
258% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CTD 859B CT16G4SFS8266.C8FB 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 21.7
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20N20044US Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N20044US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback