HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 135
59% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 208
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$83
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 330 382 363 385 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 425
Write 390
Mixed 364
SusWrite 369
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 26.4
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 212
157% 208 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HTS545050B7E660 500GB
8GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 54 55 55 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 54.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 55.7
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $402
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback