Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350D APU 269 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 35.8 20% 30.1 Pts	4-Core 31.4 8-Core 35 4% 33.2 Pts	64-Core 23.6 2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 9802) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 198 229 227 262 232 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.1% Below average	Read 231 Write 224 Mixed 190 SusWrite 228 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 7.3 45% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 61.2 DQ Mixed 12.9 18% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB 800, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5.4 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 4.1 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	1x
E-350D APUAMDBench 27%, 269 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	2x

SSD
512GB 512GBT-forceBench 77%, 4,987 samples	1x
GOODRAM 120GBBench 68%, 5,433 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GBHynixBench 13%, 1 sample	1x
CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 16GBCorsairBench 30%, 5 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16