Lenovo R30328K6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Lenovo R30328K6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SKYBAY
Memory	30.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20171107
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 197 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 608 61% 496 Pts	64-Core 612 38% 612 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 139 Parallax 128 104% 131 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 131 Splatting 115 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,021 Write 1,445 Mixed 1,256 348% 1,574 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 50.8 169% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 725 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 551 420% 575 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 687GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 34 33 33 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 102 Write 94.6 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 33.8 56% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 656GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 24 25 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 64.6 Write 46 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 23.2 35% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 880 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 785GB free, PID a100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 39 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 37.2 Mixed 23 SusWrite 37.8 46% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 0215 CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.6% Very good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 22.7 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 22.9 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R30328K6 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Lenovo R30328K6

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x

RAM
CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 0215 CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 48GBUnknownBench 69%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo R30328K6

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo R30328K6

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)