Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSupermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+
Memory123.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 618
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2877 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 203
Parallax 200
155% 198 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 199
Splatting 133
127% 158 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 149 59 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 473
Write 366
Mixed 334
SusWrite 120
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 26.4
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 170
156% 237 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB HMT42GR7AFR4C-PB HMT42GR7AFR4C-PB ... 128GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 36.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback