Gigabyte GA-MZ72-HB0-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZ72-HB0-00  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220530
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 02:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 73F3 16-Core
P0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 115
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 651
61% 509 Pts
64-Core 5,443
337% 5,443 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 18.9
14% 17.3 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 15
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3041 3073 2988 2850 2791 2890 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 2,902
Write 3,310
Mixed 3,037
SusWrite 2,938
689% 3,047 MB/s
4K Read 78.5
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 109
367% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,506
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,300
981% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 469%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-3G2E1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
204% Outstanding
MC Read 172
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 42.3
237% 82.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 34.4
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZ72-HB0-00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZ72-HB0-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback