Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-D1KW200MZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPanasonic CF-D1KW200MZ  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFD1-2V
Memory11.7 GB free of 16.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140306
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 07:00
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 24.9
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 68.4
23% 40.9 Pts
4-Core 46.8
8-Core 66.8
7% 56.8 Pts
64-Core 69.2
4% 69.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2-power SSD2043A 480GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 148 175 205 195 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 202
Write 191
Mixed 171
SusWrite 173
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 12.6
49% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 41.4
55% 102 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QHO-YK0 M471B1G73QHO-YK0 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 40960 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-D1KW200MZ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-D1KW200MZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback