Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 00:07
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 211
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 514
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 87.2
52% 71.4 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 47.3
49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$67
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,322
Write 888
Mixed 829
224% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 61.2
211% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 218
230% 370 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Netac OnlyDisk 32GB
3GB free, PID 2004
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34
Write 16
Mixed 19.4
26% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback