Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Vivo AIO V241EA_V241EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivo AIO V241EA_V241EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V241EA
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 37.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 271
76% 151 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 522
59% 461 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1482) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 23.5
17% 22.3 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 19
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 849 859 888 164 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 664
Write 827
Mixed 657
SusWrite 599
155% 686 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 27.2
118% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 118
90% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 104%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 15.7
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS Vivo AIO V241EA_V241EA Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS Vivo AIO V241EA_V241EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback