Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '17 at 08:16
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 196 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 381 52% 384 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.55 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 6.31 Parallax 5.34 4% 5.52 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 6.27 Splatting 8.48 6% 6.85 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
C400-MTFDDAC128M 128GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0D09 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3906 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 568 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 23 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4032999391787 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 81 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 33 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	56.1% Above average	Read 270 Write 183 Mixed 218 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 11.8 96% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 13.2 47% 104 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 100 173053735 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 27 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8675714 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11101 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 397 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 5 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 63 387186711 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 77309411351 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 18 173053735 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	38% Below average	Read 109 Write 23.2 Mixed 36.4 42% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.17 57% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 20GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 89.7 Write 47.8 Mixed 63.6 79% 67 MB/s	4K Read 5.91 4K Write 3.46 4K Mixed 1.66 196% 3.68 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 4x4GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 34.5 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16