Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 147 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 353 41% 320 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3729) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 36.7 29% 37.1 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 26.2 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 114 58 64 57 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 368 Write 338 Mixed 137 SusWrite 81.7 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 19.6 98% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 36.8 36% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF SH564568FH8N6PHSFG 99P5471-011.A00LF SH564568FH8N6PHSFG 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $165Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	2x
X110 128GBSanDisk $89Bench 71%, 11,245 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 2x4GBMicronBench 47%, 1,539 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	1x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	1x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $234