Lenovo 10JAS05300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10JAS05300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 44.2
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 110
41% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 161
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30EE) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 9.5
4% 6.17 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 240 78 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 257
Write 136
Mixed 222
SusWrite 142
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 20.8
77% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 164
137% 199 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 91%
Txrui X500 120GB
118GB free
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 91 315 112 74 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
Read 377
Write 317
Mixed 291
SusWrite 151
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 6.2
60% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 13.8
54% 119 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10JAS05300 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10JAS05300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback