Today's hottest deals

Asrock B75M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B75M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131220
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 16:49
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 86.6
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 134
61% 99 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 161
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 35.7
22% 30 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 25.1
22% 27 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 176 177 206 208 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 350
Write 292
Mixed 302
SusWrite 188
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 14.5
70% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 45.7
72% 136 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 134 141 143 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 140
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8783 SRT4G86U1-H9M 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B75M - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback