Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C850-14D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE PRO C850-14D  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 11:35
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B820
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 64.6
34% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 67.6
8% 62.8 Pts
64-Core 63.5
4% 63.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB30) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 72 76 74 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 46.9
Write 86.5
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 74.6
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Adata AD73I1B1674EU 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C850-14D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C850-14D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback