Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170707
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '17 at 18:25
Run Duration	371 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 140 2-Core 267 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 737 76% 612 Pts	64-Core 745 46% 745 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 33.4 Parallax 41.5 27% 36.1 fps	MRender 46.3 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 33.7 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,529 Write 1,056 Mixed 1,061 269% 1,215 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 41.9 190% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 878 DQ Write 604 DQ Mixed 259 323% 580 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 236%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 56GB free Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -66563403145500 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2297 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 70 (B7) Unknown 100 100 25 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 32 55 60133146656 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 70 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 490056 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 51 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 91 91 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 490056 (F2) Unknown 100 100 519800 (F9) Unknown 100 100 80717	82.5% Excellent	Read 494 Write 231 Mixed 319 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 21.5 129% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 53.3 93% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 91%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 160 Write 118 Mixed 98.2 151% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.19 92% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 93.9 Write 99.9 Mixed 67.4 110% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.31 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 105 Write 90.7 Mixed 64.9 107% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.18 67% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 50%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 104 Write 83.3 Mixed 67.3 104% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.22 69% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 50%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 880GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 73.8 Write 74.8 Mixed 56.9 87% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.33 85% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 34%
ST320006 44NS 2TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 288GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 91.3 Write 83.7 Mixed 74.7 105% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.46 80% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 45%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 187GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 83.3 Mixed 51.8 88% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 57%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 46GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 109 Write 100 Mixed 70.1 115% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.23 87% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.1 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 23.3 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	471x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	421x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	202x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $751

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16