Lenovo 10A90012MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Lenovo 10A90012MX (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory	16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211223
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 03 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 156 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 428 47% 372 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 40.3 32% 40.5 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 28.3 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB 5,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.4 6.7 6.5 6.6 7.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 79%
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB 5,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 14GB free Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.1 7.1 6.3 7.6 7.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 79%
PNY ELITE 240GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 54GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7 7 7.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$79 2,695 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 228GB free Firmware: PC2OC72E SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 26 26 38 46 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 89.6 Write 97.6 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 33.7 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 24GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.4% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.4 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 10A90012MX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Lenovo 10A90012MX

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 24GBElpidaBench 44%, 1 sample	1x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 28GBHynixBench 44%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $179

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 10A90012MX

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 10A90012MX

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)