Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$150
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 311
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
HP(103C 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 1.1
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK128MBF 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 155 153 155 156 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 456
Write 434
Mixed 362
SusWrite 171
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 38.1
131% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 232
205% 307 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 38 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 39.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 39.2
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965432-082.A00LF 9965525-138.A00LF 9965432-082.A00LF 9965525-138.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback