Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D15
MotherboardMSI MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 08:12
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 314
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,052
103% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,433
89% 1,433 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 79.3
77% 88.3 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 72.2
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 48 89 3.6 13 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 154
Write 102
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 49.5
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 18.5
76% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 60.8
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 101
70% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
60GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 156 161 136 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 164
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 148
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 52.4
Write 88.9
Mixed 60.5
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 67%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$37
169GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 67 65 64 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41% Average
Read 78.4
Write 49.9
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 64.2
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$50
156GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 139 138 136 139 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 133
Write 97.3
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 136
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 26.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 217 58 60 21.5" 1920 1080 DEL2009 E2219HN
Typical MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15) Builds (Compare 2,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560 TORPEDO (MS-7D15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback