Today's hottest deals

Runing E5 VER: 3.2S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardRuning E5 VER: 3.2S1  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 20:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 184
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 548
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 60.5
38% 47.9 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 25.2
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 136 131 130 133 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 311
Write 206
Mixed 207
SusWrite 146
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 21
80% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 58.6
DQ Write 61.4
DQ Mixed 53.4
42% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5474-016.A Corsair CML32GX3M4A18 Corsair CML32GX3M4A18 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 41 198 20 60 28.9" 1920 1080 PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV
Typical E5 VER: 3.2S1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Runing E5 VER: 3.2S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback