HP p2-1105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p2-1105  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD4
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111125
Uptime16.9 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 20:25
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 82
44% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 95.3
8-Core 92.2
13% 93.8 Pts
64-Core 91
6% 91 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AD4) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 40 38 51 92 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45% Average
Read 92.7
Write 97.1
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 64
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 50
Write 28
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 17
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 69%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
302GB free, PID 1051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 16 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 104
Write 8.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 15.2
32% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
19% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B1G73AH0-CH9 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 36 60 22" 1280 720 ONN0101 100002480
Typical p2-1105 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p2-1105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback