Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 320%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 384%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics283% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A96
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 11:20
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$350
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 220
2-Core 431
125% 243 Pts
4-Core 830
8-Core 1,516
141% 1,173 Pts
64-Core 3,012
186% 3,012 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 117%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
HP(103C 8B69) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5700 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
283% Outstanding
Lighting 406
Reflection 454
Parallax 485
331% 448 fps
MRender 572
Gravity 393
Splatting 281
324% 415 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 283%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRZ-2T00-1106 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2234 2437 2609 2695 2691 2689 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,972
Write 2,508
Mixed 2,153
SusWrite 2,559
573% 2,548 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 58.4
201% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 967
667% 844 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 372%
Great: 564%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT343.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1837 1696 1578 984 921 988 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 1,360
Mixed 1,483
SusWrite 1,334
310% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 60.6
211% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 959
638% 772 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 229%
Great: 303%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 38 40 38 157 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 462
Write 394
Mixed 363
SusWrite 106
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 22.4
DQ Mixed 0.4
22% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
439GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 229 219 213 215 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 456
Write 376
Mixed 310
SusWrite 246
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 33.8
115% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 247
204% 294 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$90
938GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 148 148 150 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 148
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 HP52U40S8HM-16FRA KF552C40-16 HP52U40S8HM-16FRA 64GB
5200, 5200, 5200, 5200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 70
MC Write 69.6
MC Mixed 66
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 32.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 174%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F3 DELL S3220DGF
Typical OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 40L Gaming Desktop GT21-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,050
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback