Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 23:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 125
55% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 364
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 45.8
28% 39.3 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 26.3
25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 215 218 220 210 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.7% Above average
Read 243
Write 262
Mixed 225
SusWrite 218
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 33.4
101% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 37.6
34% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2933 C12 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7748 LG WFHD
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback