M&A DB75EN__

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemM&A DB75EN__  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DB75EN
Memory12.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 03:01
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 87.3
46% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 253
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Dell(1028 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 66.5
51% 64.3 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 56.9
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1021A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 45 57 191 64 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 394
Write 351
Mixed 330
SusWrite 92.1
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 7.3
45% 105 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
230GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 78.9
Write 80.4
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 77.6
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C10-8GSR 04CD F3-1866C10-8GSR 86D3 24GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.5" 1920 1009 AUS242A ASUS VG249Q1A
Typical DB75EN__ Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: M&A DB75EN__

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback