Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '17 at 07:16
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.7% Very good
SC Int 98.8
SC Float 97.2
SC Mixed 99.4
79% 98.5 Pts
QC Int 381
QC Float 378
QC Mixed 386
86% 382 Pts
MC Int 725
MC Float 773
MC Mixed 763
113% 754 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$713
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 509
Reflection 541
Parallax 592
167% 547 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 561
Splatting 297
169% 380 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 168%
Great: 178%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
140GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 519
Write 332
Mixed 391
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 17.7
103% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 43.2
38% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 98%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$170
99GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 483
Write 337
Mixed 337
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 20.8
90% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 42.2
50% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 506
Write 475
Mixed 455
107% 478 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 20.7
108% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 17.4
48% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
582GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 168
Write 140
Mixed 136
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.25
116% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 1TB
342GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 42.8
Write 39.7
Mixed 31
47% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.26
77% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 43%
Staples 4GB
4GB free, PID 5573
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 3.25
Mixed 5.19
9% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.36
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 1.22
103% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$280
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 22.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 124%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $148SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback