Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 219
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 717
73% 589 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Zotac(19DA 9527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 106
Parallax 118
97% 114 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 116
Splatting 97.1
91% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 449 443 471 472 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 483
Mixed 362
SusWrite 458
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 38.8
142% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 294
243% 348 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$30
353GB free
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 499 499 497 498 499 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,738
Write 518
Mixed 586
SusWrite 498
183% 835 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 43.8
157% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 338
315% 488 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 174%
Great: 216%
3 480GB SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 408 406 415 416 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 417
Mixed 390
SusWrite 412
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 28.1
129% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 44.6
88% 172 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 101%
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 556 210 210 210 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,192
Write 849
Mixed 872
SusWrite 378
184% 823 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 59.1
197% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 547
432% 589 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 159%
Great: 169%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
342GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 71.7
Write 116
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 84.4
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 71%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 06.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 113
Write 97.7
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 104
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
930GB free
Firmware: AP18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 166 181 162 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 118
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 160
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 SAM0F57 C27JG5x
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback