Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 12:38
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 187
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 682
62% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,719
106% 1,719 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.61
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0.97
1% 0.88 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C400-MTFDDAC128M 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0D09
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 271
Write 182
Mixed 173
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 8.83
59% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 60.3
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 0.98
20% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 65%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
6GB free
Firmware: 5G04
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 119
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.91
4K Mixed 0.61
159% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 35.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback