Lenovo 30B4A338IG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30B4A338IG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 122
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 455
44% 363 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
20% 8.47 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 27.4
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 675 681 683 674 667 646 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 649
Write 632
Mixed 636
SusWrite 671
146% 647 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 47.7
159% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 725
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 640
480% 642 MB/s
Poor: 312%
This bench: 145%
Great: 598%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 202 201 202 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 205
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 201
129% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 119%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 156 146 142 138 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 148
Write 157
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 133
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 114%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 30 27 25 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 224
Write 31.8
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 33.7
81% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3
218% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A4K40BB2-CTD 63GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.1% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 22.2
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 15.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 75 31.5" 2560 1377 GSM5B96 LG HDR QHD
Typical 30B4A338IG Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30B4A338IG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback