Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 17:42
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 631
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 430
Mixed 320
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 38.6
149% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 117
112% 179 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 83%
KingFast 120GB
32GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 41.5
Write 41.5
Mixed 40.5
53% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 10.2
1,058% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 10.6
1,112% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
NET416384UD32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 21.2
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF6 SAMSUNG
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback