Spectra SPB3000C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSpectra SPB3000C  (all builds)
MotherboardCINCOZE DS-1200
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 12:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 261
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 846
81% 671 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000
Nvidia(10DE 12DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 44.9
37% 48 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 47.5
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CIS 2S T380 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A008024e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 430 328 203 203 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 434
Mixed 413
SusWrite 302
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 40.5
145% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 235
173% 223 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 93%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 37 50 44 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CIR-S4SUSR2408G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BA6 BN650Y
Typical SPB3000C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Spectra SPB3000C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback