Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_R1504VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_R1504VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504VA
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230227
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 11:24
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
72% 137 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 561
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 287D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 15.9
12% 16.2 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 14.3
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 1467 1454 1467 764 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,079
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 1,124
269% 1,188 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 31.9
182% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 844
646% 878 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 205%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2 Kingmax GSOH22F-28---------- 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_R1504VA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_R1504VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback