| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 09 '18 at 19:02 |
| Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
| Run User | MAR-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
68.7%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
43% 318 Pts
|
20% 328 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.4%
Below average
|
33% 33.3 fps
|
29% 35.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 859B CT51264BA1339.C16F 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
42.9%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 299 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 48x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 41x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |