Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1603QA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 01:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 31.4
1-Core 65
2-Core 117
38% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 365
33% 276 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.37
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 30.2
7% 18.5 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 11.6
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKCN.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 379 44 93 49 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 629
Write 644
Mixed 610
SusWrite 256
120% 535 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 42.6
144% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 381
280% 371 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 102%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1G44CB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 18.8
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1618
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback