Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8950

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 8950  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09D2HH
Memory39.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '24 at 20:27
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 196
2-Core 383
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 748
8-Core 1,483
132% 1,116 Pts
64-Core 2,230
138% 2,230 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 113
94% 112 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 101
Splatting 94
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 512GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,916
Write 2,775
Mixed 2647
621% 2,779 MB/s
4K Read 72.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 95.6
301% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 587
398% 479 MB/s
Poor: 135% Great: 416%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 500GB
249GB free
Firmware: RVT44B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 477 476 471 418 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 475
Mixed 457
SusWrite 433
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 43.9
144% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 335
253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
177GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 133 140 130 151 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 93.3
Write 100
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 139
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 029E0000802C CMK32GX5M2A4800C40 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 48GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
135% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 49.2
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 30.2
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32A8 ASUS VG32VQR
Typical XPS 8950 Builds (Compare 3,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

System: Dell XPS 8950

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback