Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 03:31
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 443
55% 420 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 110
Parallax 96.5
75% 99.6 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 87.7
Splatting 85.6
73% 89.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5300_MTFDDAK240TDS 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D3MC000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 266 303 298 300 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 401
Write 293
Mixed 259
SusWrite 273
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 34.7
129% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 236
190% 263 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FDD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2723 VG27A
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback