Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240320
Uptime23.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '24 at 15:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 214
2-Core 401
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 739
8-Core 1,286
122% 1,012 Pts
64-Core 2,302
142% 2,302 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1731) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 176
Parallax 177
130% 171 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 150
Splatting 124
135% 172 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,858
Write 5,512
Mixed 3163
1,006% 4,511 MB/s
4K Read 74.5
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 102
334% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 1,136
860% 1,155 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 662%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR56S46BS8HA-16KM 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 75.6
MC Write 70.2
MC Mixed 67
203% 70.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 27.2
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 179%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 5 240 16" 1707 996 CMN162F
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback