Today's hottest deals

Tecno MEGABOOK T15DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemTecno MEGABOOK T15DA  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault MEGABOOK T15DA
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 09:35
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 59.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 272
83% 158 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 651
71% 562 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.14051.1000
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 19.1
11% 12.9 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 15.8
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F512G 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.28
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,794
Write 2,153
Mixed 1,626
416% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 52
189% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 118
244% 499 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H54G56CYRBX247 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 26% 35 98 24 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15E8
Typical MEGABOOK T15DA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Tecno MEGABOOK T15DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback